My main job is to make my residents look good and do their job better. So many medical students are completely clueless with how to go about doing this and furthermore they are annoyed and feel that they are above this task. They are forced to learn the hard way when they get poor reviews despite their good clinical knowledge. It is just like life where it is about keeping those around you happy, whether it is your spouse or your boss or the cop that pulls you over for speeding. If you can keep these people genuinely happy you do well and your life ends up being being happy and you have less problems.
The grades from 3rd year are arguably the most important aspect of getting you a good residency. The grades are based largely upon your evaluations that you get from the residents and attending physicians that you work with. Many med students who do very well (all A's) during their first 2 years of basic science are frustrated with their poor performance during 3rd year. The grading is subjective unlike the objective grading of the first 2 years. I have always been a fan of the subjective grading and tend to do well where you are graded based on how people like you. When you are applying for residency the resident directors realize that they are going to have to deal with you for the next 3 - 6 years and they want someone that is easy to get along with and someone who works hard. Many residency directors have said that they would take a student with stellar 3rd year grades / evaluations and poor to mediocre clinical science grades over someone who has mediocre 3rd year evaluations but straight A's and great grades test scores from their clinical science years. The perfect candidate would excel in both areas but interestingly enough those that do really well the first 2 years do not do as well during their 3rd and 4th years and often a mediocre student in the clinical sciences will excel 3rd and 4th year.
No comments:
Post a Comment